This is an alternate content page containing a Flash Card Activity. It has opened in a new window.
Here is a list of the terms and definitions on each card.

Card 1:
Term: Begging the Question
Definition: The fallacy committed by an argument when its premises presuppose, directly or indirectly, the truth of its conclusion. (6.7.1)
Card 2:
Term: Coherence Theory of Truth
Definition: A theory that holds that a particular statement is true when it is part of a coherent set of mutually supporting statements. (6.1.2)
Card 3:
Term: Correspondence Theory of Truth
Definition: A theory that holds that the truth of a statement is its correspondence to a fact. (6.1.1)
Card 4:
Term: Empirical Fact
Definition: A fact that is observable in principle—that is, if one were in the right place at the right time, under the right conditions. (6.1.1)
Card 5:
Term: Empirical Statement
Definition: A statement that asserts an empirical fact, or a set of empirical facts. (6.1.1)
Card 6:
Term: Equivocation
Definition: The fallacy committed by an argument when a premise has two interpretations, one acceptable and one unacceptable, and when it is the unacceptable interpretation that is required by the conclusion. (6.7.3)
Card 7:
Term: Exclusive Alternatives
Definition: Alternatives that cannot both (or all) be true: when one is true, the other(s) must be false. (6.7.4)
Card 8:
Term: Exhaustive Alternatives
Definition: Alternatives that cover all the possibilities. (6.7.4)
Card 9:
Term: False Dichotomy
Definition: The fallacy committed by an argument when a premise presents us with a choice between two alternatives and assumes that they are exhaustive or exclusive or both, when in fact they are not. (6.7.4)
Card 10:
Term: Falsified Truth-Claim
Definition: A truth-claim that has been shown to be false. (6.2)
Card 11:
Term: Foundational Principles
Definition: Statements that underlie a practice or body of knowledge, such as the law of causality in science, which cannot be doubted without undermining everything else associated with that practice or body of knowledge. (6.2.2)
Card 12:
Term: General Empirical Statement
Definition: A statement the truth-value of which depends on experience and concerns a wide range of particulars within the same class. (6.2.1)
Card 13:
Term: Inconsistency
Definition: The fallacy committed by an argument when it contains, implicitly or explicitly, a contradiction, usually between two premises. (6.7.2)
Card 14:
Term: Pragmatic Theory of Truth
Definition: A theory that holds that the truth of a statement consists in the fact that it leads to the successful solution of a real problem. (6.1.3)
Card 15:
Term: Statistical Empirical Statement
Definition: A qualified general statement the truth-value of which depends on experience; it asserts something about a proportion of a class of things. (6.2.1)
Card 16:
Term: Strict Proof
Definition: The most stringent standard of acceptability that can be made for a claim because the possibility of error has been eliminated (either in its use of empirical evidence or its support in a theorem). (6.3)
Card 17:
Term: Undetermined Truth-Claim
Definition: A truth-claim that has been neither shown to be true nor shown to be false. (6.2)
Card 18:
Term: Universal Empirical Statement
Definition: An unrestricted general statement about a class of things the truth-value of which depends on experience; it asserts something about the entire class. (6.2.1)
Card 19:
Term: Verification
Definition: The process of determining whether a truth-claim is true. (6.2)
Card 20:
Term: Verified Truth-Claim
Definition: A truth-claim that has been shown to be true. (6.2)